What AI search changes about SEO, and what it doesn't
On Google, AI search doesn't call for a separate discipline: AI Overviews and AI Mode are built on its core Search systems, and Google says they need no special files or markup. What changes is the kind of content worth publishing, how you measure visibility, and the need to plan for AI tools that follow different rules.
By Netmark. Published . Updated .
Key takeaways
- On Google, optimizing for AI features is still SEO, with no special files or schema required.
- Generic pages are the real risk, so add what only you can say.
- Other AI tools follow their own rules, so test them separately.
Google's AI features start from the same foundation as Search
Google describes its generative AI features as "rooted in our core Search ranking and quality systems." These features retrieve pages from the Search index to ground a response, a method known as retrieval-augmented generation, then show links to supporting pages. They may also use query fan-out, which runs several related searches across subtopics.
To be a supporting link in AI Overviews or AI Mode, a page must be indexed and eligible to show a snippet, and the site must not be opted out of generative AI features in Search Console settings. Beyond that, Google lists no special technical requirements. Meeting those requirements doesn't guarantee your page will appear.
Google goes further on labels. Its guide says that optimizing for generative AI search "is optimizing for the search experience, and thus still SEO." We think the name matters less than the work. Call it AEO or SEO, and judge each task by whether it helps people and search systems find and trust your content.
The tactics Google says you can skip
Google's guide has a section on what you don't need to do, and it's useful to keep open when you review a proposal. If someone sells one of these tactics as the way to win on Google, ask what evidence they have.
| Practice | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Indexed pages that can show a snippet | VerdictKeep | WhyGoogle says this is the requirement to be a supporting link. |
| Original, experience-based content | VerdictKeep | WhyGoogle warns against generic pages that repeat what's already online. |
| Structured data | VerdictKeep | WhyIt supports rich results, though Google's AI features don't require it. |
| Business and product data | VerdictKeep | WhyGoogle recommends keeping Business Profile and Merchant Center information current. |
| AI text files for Google | VerdictStop | WhyGoogle says you don't need llms.txt, AI text files, special markup, or Markdown to appear in Search. |
| Chunking content | VerdictStop | WhyGoogle can understand several topics on one page, and it says there's no ideal page length. |
| Rewriting for AI | VerdictStop | WhyIts systems understand synonyms and meaning, so chasing every long-tail wording isn't necessary. |
| Inauthentic mentions | VerdictStop | WhyArtificial mentions aren't helpful, and AI features rely on spam protections too. |
| Pages at scale | VerdictStop | WhyCreating pages to manipulate rankings or AI responses may violate Google's scaled content abuse policy. |
| llms.txt for other tools | VerdictWeigh | WhyPublish one if a tool or agent you care about can use it. |
| AI crawler access | VerdictWeigh | WhyDecide crawler by crawler, because a blanket block can hide you from tools your buyers use. |
| Prompt tracking tools | VerdictWeigh | WhyThey can be a useful directional sample, but no third-party tool sees Google's systems. |
Structured data and llms.txt deserve an honest answer
Structured data isn't an AI trick, and it's still worth doing. Google says it isn't required for generative AI search and that there's no special schema.org markup for it. Google also says to keep using it because it supports eligibility for rich results. Make sure it matches the visible text on the page.
The case for llms.txt depends on who you want to read it. Google says Search doesn't use these files, and that keeping one for other services neither helps nor harms your Search visibility. If you publish one, do it because another tool or agent you care about can use it, and expect no change in Google.
Commodity content is what really changes
The biggest shift is in the type of page worth creating. Google warns against content that "could easily be produced by a generative AI model," and its example of commodity content is a generic list of tips for first-time homebuyers. An experienced take on why one buyer waived an inspection and looked inside the sewer line is its example of the opposite. If an AI answer can summarize your page without losing anything, your page has given a reader little reason to click.
Try this on your top 20 informational pages. For each one, ask what the page contains that a summary of competing pages couldn't. That could be first-hand testing, original data, a real process, or an expert's opinion. Mark the pages with nothing unique, then improve, merge, or retire them. This is ordinary content strategy, with a higher bar.
Query fan-out points the same way. A single question can spawn related searches, which is a reason to answer the follow-up questions a buyer would have on a strong page. It isn't a reason to publish a thin page for every variation.
Measurement changes more than the tactics do
No third-party tool has access to our internal ranking or AI systems.
You now need to look at AI visibility and business results separately. The Generative AI performance report in Google Search Console shows impressions in AI Overviews and AI Mode, broken down by page, country, date, and device. Traffic from these features also counts toward the Web search type in the main Performance report.
Impressions won't tell you whether AI visibility brought in business. Compare the pages with the most AI impressions against their conversions in your analytics. Google says clicks from pages with AI Overviews are higher quality, and you can test that claim on your own site. We'd report AI referral traffic as its own channel for this reason.
Be careful with third-party visibility scores. Prompt tracking tools can still be useful as a sample of what appears for prompts you choose. Treat them as a directional sample, and use your first-party data for decisions.
Google's view covers Google, and other AI tools work differently
All of the guidance above comes from Google and describes Google. Other assistants have their own crawlers, sources, and controls, so ranking well in Google doesn't tell you how you appear elsewhere. Testing the tools your buyers use is the only way to know.
OpenAI separates its crawlers by purpose. OAI-SearchBot surfaces sites in ChatGPT search, while GPTBot gathers content that may train its models, and you can allow one and block the other. A site that opts out of OAI-SearchBot won't appear in ChatGPT search answers, apart from navigational links. So a blanket block on AI bots can hide you from a tool your buyers use.
Microsoft offers its own view too. The AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools shows when your content is cited in Copilot and AI summaries in Bing. It doesn't show clicks, so a citation alone can't tell you whether anyone visited. Each tool's results need to be read separately.
Where to start
We think the first step is to confirm the basics, then spend your time on content and measurement. This order keeps you from paying for hacks while a technical problem blocks the pages that matter.
- 1. Confirm your key pages are indexed and can show a snippet, and that nobody has opted your site out of generative AI features in Search Console. Check that robots.txt, your CDN, and your hosting all allow crawling.
- 2. Review pages for commodity content, and add what only you can say.
- 3. Keep Google Business Profile and Merchant Center information current where they apply.
- 4. Set up Search Console reporting, and connect AI traffic to conversions.
- 5. Decide which non-Google AI crawlers you'll allow, and write the decision down.
Common questions
Do I need an llms.txt file for Google AI Overviews?
No. Google says you don't need llms.txt or other AI text files to appear in its AI features, and that Search doesn't use them. You can keep one for other services. Google says doing so neither helps nor harms your visibility in Search.
Does structured data help you appear in AI Overviews?
Google says structured data isn't required for its generative AI features, and there's no special schema.org markup for them. Structured data is still worth using because it supports eligibility for rich results. It should always match the visible content on the page.
Is AEO different from SEO?
For Google, not really. Its guide says optimizing for generative AI search is still SEO. The extra work comes from other AI tools, which have their own crawlers and controls, and from tracking AI visibility. Those tasks build on SEO instead of replacing it.
How do I see my performance in AI Overviews and AI Mode?
Use the Generative AI performance report in Google Search Console. It shows impressions in AI Overviews and AI Mode by page, country, date, and device. Pair it with your analytics, because impressions alone can't show whether that visibility led to conversions.
How do I control how my content appears in Google's AI features?
Google's AI features are part of Search, so Googlebot rules apply. To limit what's shown from a page, Google points to nosnippet, data-nosnippet, max-snippet, and noindex controls. Search Console also has a site-wide setting to opt out of generative AI features. Google says opting out removes your traffic and impressions from those features but isn't used as a ranking signal elsewhere in Search. Use these controls with care, because a page must be eligible for a snippet to appear as a supporting link.
Want help putting this to work?
Tell us where your marketing stands today, and we'll show you what to do first.